1. Alexandra Hofer approaches the phenomenon of unilateral coercive measures from both the positivist and sociological angles. The positivist approach seeks to determine the existence of a norm prohibiting unilateral economic sanctions. The author concludes that the conditions are not met to attest that such a customary norm has emerged. The sociological angle rather determines why developed and developing countries hold diverging views on the lawfulness of unilateral economic sanctions regimes. The author believes that there are fundamental differences in the values they convey, which necessarily follow from their own identities. 2. Hofer’s interpretation is convincing. It has the merit of highlighting the different views of States on the lawfulness and legitimacy of unilateral economic sanctions. However, this analysis is not exhaustive. The author confines herself to exploring one particular aspect of a multifaceted subject. Patrick C.R. Terry (Unilateral Economic Sanctions and Their Extraterritorial Impact: One Foreign Policy...